Is a coach autocratic?

Autocratic coaching can best be summarized with the phrase: “My way or my way. Autocratic coaches make decisions with little or no participation of the player or players. The autocratic coach articulates a vision of what players should achieve and players are expected to perform. Autocratic coaching is a training style that takes a “tell” approach rather than a “ask” approach.

Some describe it as “My way or my way”. This training style tends to be used in situations where a client needs to learn a specific technique to promote their development. Instead of giving the client the reins or asking them to do something, the coach will take full control of the session, explaining exactly what needs to be done and encouraging the client to follow their example. Often referred to as the dictatorship of training styles, an autocratic coach is the one who makes all the decisions.

This coach makes decisions for the team without consulting his athletes. These coaches “can explain the objectives and goals to their players (and can ask limited questions), but the coach has the final word regarding the way the team acts and plays. Ultimately, the only role that is required of athletes is to follow what the coach tells them. It follows the principles and teachings of traditional life coaching, such as setting goals, creating action plans and working on habits and beliefs, but, unlike traditional coaching, the client is guided in a more spiritual way.

When holistic training first considers the player or employee as a person, laissez-faire assumes that players or employees will automatically motivate themselves and assume their responsibilities. Improvement is at the heart of coaching, and performance improvement is at the heart of performance coaching. Of course, there are many other types of training styles in management, and there are also completely different management approaches that are not based on a training mentality. This method gives the team freedom and responsibility, and the coach intervenes only when necessary to keep the process going.

Many coaches consider mentality and work with it in their practice, even if they are not described as mentality coaches. Coaches like Vince Lombardi moved mountains and won championships, creating a successful training model (for better or worse) that has been replicated everywhere. It's important to know what type of training style you respond best to in order to have a more effective and pleasant relationship with your coach. While a democratic coach can make the final decisions, he will base these decisions on the client's own opinions and feelings.

It may take a little longer to see results than other approaches, but when it comes to performance training styles, it can be very effective, as the team has a responsibility to work together and explore solutions as a whole. If this is something you're looking for specifically, but the coach you're interested in doesn't mention mentality, feel free to ask if this is an area where they can help you. By finding what training style works for you, you'll be able to identify the training qualities that motivate you during practices and meetings. Coaching methods can be an effective way to address a work culture that, at best, seems unproductive and, at worst, failed.

Team coaching involves a single coach working together with a group of managers, executives, or a team within a company or organization. In many ways, this no-intervention training style is similar to the holistic training method, with one key difference.